
Asha Sharma and Matt Booty from Microsoft's Xbox division took the unusual step of publishing an internal memo this week, titled "Next 100 Days: Xbox Reset". In it, Sharma and Booty detail how they think their revival of the Xbox brand is going, and the various challenges and opportunities await the company in the near future.
The most interesting section for me was on storage price rises, which Asha says doubled between fall 2025 and February 2026, have doubled again between February and June, and are set to have more than quintupled by the 2027 holiday season. It's a similar story for RAM, which of course is made from the same limited supply of flash memory. Moreover, Asha thinks that Xbox is uniquely vulnerable to these pricing increases due to "choices we have made over the last half decade".
I'm intrigued by that, as Series X has the same 16GB RAM allocation as the PS5, while Series S uses less; in terms of storage, the 1TB total is similar between both consoles too. Perhaps this is a reference to existing agreements for SSD/RAM supply, or perhaps an unwillingness by past leadership to commit to purchasing high volumes of these components over long time periods at a set price? It could also refer to having two more distinct SKUs, Series X and Series S, with different board designs and requirements, including split memory pools, in comparison to Sony's more modular and standardised PS5 approach.
Here's that section in full:
We are in a hardware component crisis. When I joined as CEO in February, the price we paid for console storage components was over 2x as high as we paid last fall. These costs have since doubled again. And as we plan for the 2027 holiday season, we expect another significant increase, taking us over 5x the prices we paid only two years earlier. Memory costs have followed a broadly similar trajectory. While the entire industry is facing a components crisis, we believe we have been impacted more greatly than many of our peers due to the choices we made over the last half decade. We are currently unable to make as many consoles as players want to buy, and we need a new business model and partnerships for hardware as we remain committed to Helix.
The entire memo is well worth reading as background information on the Xbox brand and the wider gaming business space, with the pair discussing the need to improve Xbox's infrastructure, spend more on key franchises, continue to compete for attention and reduce costs, the latter likely via layoffs. It's a sobering read, but an important one, I think.
What do you make of the memo? Let me know in the comments below.
[source news.xbox.com]





Comments 8
At this rate only the richest of the elite will be able to afford the hardware that these companies, who are so heavily invested in A.I., want us all to use!!!
Absolutely sick and fed up of the whole A.I. thing and cannot wait for the bubble to burst. It has to at some point, right?
We had an extended cross-gen period last time due to COVID and now we have to contend with rising hardware prices (which is bad because it means fewer sales) and possibly an even longer cross-gen period this time (which isn't necessarily a bad thing).
This is the first generation where console hardware prices have increased rather than decreased and signs are that things are only to get more expensive with the next gen consoles. This could potentially be very damaging to the games industry as a whole.
Is "the choices we have made" a reflection of the hardware in Helix? Helix is rumoured to have 48GB of GDDR7 and 2TB of storage, PS5 is 30-40GB and 1TB (although expandable with M.2 drives), so their choice has been to lock themselves into 50-80% more RAM cost and double the storage cost for next gen, that means that they are going to be significantly more expensive than their direct competitor, the extra baseline cost is going to add £250-300 to the Helix just on a materials cost.
@Darren1967 at this rate no one will be able to buy it because the entire business model will collapse and there won't be a new console. why would they spend all that money to build a console so expensive no one will be willing to buy it.
Ironically, Microsoft are part of the problem as they are heavily invested in A.I. so maybe the Xbox division needs to have a quiet word with them and ask them not to buy so many memory chips and storage devices?
The idea of anything gaining in value that fast is insane. At this point computers the world over will be like cars in Cuba, being outdated and needing to be kept alive as long as possible because they can't be replaced.
Man, **** late stage capitalism and AI. We were on the cusp of a gaming renaissance with the launch of the Steam Deck and numerous other handheld PCs coming to the market, and the Steam Machine was going to be a way to ween my console friends off of their boxes and onto a beginner friendly gaming PC. AI killed 100% of that, since basic living costs have skyrocketed and $1,000+ for an entry level device is just not doable for so many people. 2026 was going to be the year that 100% of my gaming friend group was going to be on the PC platform in some form or another, and now that won’t be happening for the foreseeable future.
Microsoft is a nearly $3 trillion company. If it wanted, it could invest in building the manufacturing capability to produce its own hardware components. Yes, this would take a few years at least to get up and running, but if prices are just going to keep climbing, what's stopping them? (Answer: Redmond is too obsessed with A.I. right now to give a hoot, and does not particularly care if its gaming hardware division dies as a result.)
Microsoft is part of the reason we’re in a hardware crisis ffs
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...